biggest-loss-prevention-mistakes-retailers-make

The biggest loss prevention mistakes retailers make

Battling retail loss is an ongoing challenge for retailers. With the cost of that loss currently at $61.7 billion in the US, the stakes have never been higher.

However, many retailers struggle to either understand where their loss is occurring or do not have sufficient strategies in place to address it. So let’s look at the five biggest loss prevention mistakes retailers make.

Not knowing their numbers

You cannot manage what you do not measure, so it’s imperative retailers understand exactly where loss is occurring and when it is most likely to happen.

Loss can be attributed to a number of factors in-store, including malicious threats like shoplifting and employee theft. It can also come down to non-malicious problems like human error. Loss may also occur in the supply chain, or via e-commerce.

Only when a retailer delves into the big picture of where their store’s weaknesses lie, are they able to develop the right strategies to combat that loss.

Failing to get back to basics

Not investing in loss prevention

Although some of the tactics involved in shoplifting, theft and fraud may have changed, the battle remains the same.

For retailer’s, it’s about getting back to basics and protecting their store, their products, and their bottom line.

Individual items should be protected at a product-based level, using tools like electronic article surveillance, security tags, and security labels.

The store should be protected via CCTV or perhaps security personnel. It should also be protected with policies and procedures that help eliminate theft and inadvertent loss.

Not involving staff in the fight

Staff are the first line of defence when it comes to minimizing loss at all levels in-store, and they should be actively involved in the fight.

Again, that comes down to systems, procedures and also staff training. Staff should be fully abreast of best practice for returns and gift cards. They should be screened during the employment process to help minimize employee theft, and then trained regarding the signs of shoplifting.

They should be aware of stock reconciliation procedures and inventory counting that help identify both in-store loss and loss in the supply chain.

Most importantly, they should be fully cognizant of how loss impacts them personally as employees, affecting the retail bottom line and therefore putting their employment at risk.

Underestimating their opponent

Underestimating their opponent

Contrary to popular belief, shoplifters do not fit one single profile. They come from all walks of life, all age brackets and all demographics.

The methods they use to shoplift also vary, ranging from concealment of small items to complex pre-planned thefts involving groups.

The mistake many retailers make is to believe they can easily spot a shoplifter and to assume theft will not happen to them.

On average, each retailer takes a 1.62 per cent hit to the bottom line due to retail loss, with shoplifting the primary suspect.

Not investing in loss prevention

To fight loss in store, retailers need to invest in loss prevention, and this is an ongoing investment where technology and tools need to be regularly updated.

The reality is, what worked five or 10 years ago may no longer suffice in terms of security. The internet means thieves are now more savvy, and have a wealth of information at their fingertips.

For retailers, combatting this evolving threat requires them to consistently evaluate their loss prevention measures and upgrade them where required, looking at new and improved ways to mitigate potential loss.

For more information about the latest loss prevention strategies and tools, see here. Or head directly to our catalogue or state-of-the-art security tags and security labels.

holiday-shopping-starts-early-2020

Holiday shopping starts early

Early predictions that customers would start their holiday shopping earlier in 2020 are coming to fruition, with a new National Retail Federation survey finding 59 per cent of shoppers have already started making holiday purchases.

There’s also a marked shift in the way people pay for items as Covid-19 continues to weigh on consumer’s minds.

Here’s an insight into how the holiday retail season is developing so far…

Spending has started for holiday season 2020

The latest NRF data found of the 8362 adult consumers surveyed, most had already started purchasing gifts.

Fifty-nine per cent indicated they had already bought items by the first week in November, which is an increase of 21 per cent on a decade ago.

Meanwhile, 42 per cent noted this commencement of holiday spending was earlier for them personally than in years gone by.

That said, there’s still a significant amount of shopping to go. Only 26 per cent of shoppers have ticked off every item on their holiday shopping list.

What shoppers are buying

What shoppers are buying

The NRF had previously forecast that on average consumers intend to spend $997.79 on gifts, holiday items such as decorations and food, and additional “non-gift” purchases for themselves and their families.

This is a decrease of about $50 in 2019, but already trends are emerging about the gifts that shoppers are after.

Clothing and accessories topped the list of popular gifts, with 54 per cent of people indicating these would be among their gifts to others.

Gift cards were the second most popular item, with 47 per cent of people intending to buy these.

“Similar to last year, consumers plan to purchase between three and four gift cards, for an average spend of $163 per consumer. Total spending on gift cards is expected to reach $27.5 billion,” the NRF said.

Toys came in at third position with 37 per cent of shoppers seeking these out as a gift.

When it comes to the most popular toys of 2020, the survey found LEGOS and PlayStation ranked among the top items for boys and girls, while cars and trucks, Hot Wheels and video games were also popular gifts for boys, and Barbie and dolls remain the top toys for girls.

Meanwhile, 34 per cent of shoppers intend to purchase books and other media, and food/candy is on the gift list for a further 28 per cent of survey respondents.

A shift away from cash

This year the way shoppers are paying for items has seen a shift away from cash as shoppers turn online to make their purchases and also avoid using cash instore.

The NRF found credit cards (42 per cent) remain the top form of payment consumers plan to use this holiday season, followed closely by debit cards (41 per cent).

“Just 15 per cent of consumers listed cash as a top form of payment during the holidays, the lowest in the survey’s history and likely related to the coronavirus,” the NRF noted.

Half (49 per cent) of shoppers plan to use an alternative form of payment such as PayPal, Apple Pay, Samsung Pay or Venmo.

Shopper sentiment

Shopper sentiment

The NRF notes retailers have worked hard to provide a safe shopping environment to consumers in the wake of Covid-19.

The focus on hygiene and safety appears to be paying off, with 70 per cent of holiday shoppers saying that, given the precautions, retailers have taken for Covid-19, they have felt safe shopping in stores this holiday season.

Meanwhile, the preparations that retailers have undertaken for an earlier start to the season are also reaping returns.

Over two-thirds (69 per cent) of holiday shoppers say they are able to find the items they are looking for all or most of the time, and 84 per cent are confident they will receive items they order online in time for the holidays.

“Retailers have demonstrated their commitment and ability to ensure safe shopping environments for their customers and their associates,” NRF President and CEO Matthew Shay explained.

“With consumers looking to fulfil their gift lists earlier this year, retailers are prepared to meet that demand with deep discounts, robust inventory and providing the best experiences possible whether in-store or online.”

You can learn more about the holiday spending predictions for 2020 here, or see our guide for preparing your store for the busy period ahead.

the-big-picture-of retail-loss

The big picture of retail loss

If you’re looking to reduce loss in a retail environment, the first step is to examine exactly where it’s occurring.

This allows retail management to identify the most likely threats to the retail bottom line and devote appropriate resources to reducing it.

So, let’s examine a useful tool that’s been developed by experts to help retailers identify exactly where loss is occurring in-store.

Total Retail Loss

Developed over recent years by Professor Adrian Beck and the Retail Industry Leaders Association, Total Retail Loss is a concept that allows retail management to map out the full scale of all loss within a retail organization.

It breaks loss into four over-arching categories that encompass loss in-store, in the supply chain, via e-commerce and also at a corporate level.

As Loss Prevention Media notes, the value of a Total Retail Loss map is undeniable, “especially in terms of mapping out the scale of loss within your organization and strategically planning countermeasures”.

You can see the full map here, but for the purposes of this exercise, we’ll take a specific look at the loss threats that are most likely to occur in-store.

Major Total Retail Loss threats in-store

Major Total Retail Loss threats in-store

When looking specifically at the in-store environment, the Total Retail Loss approach breaks it into two major categories: unknown loss and known loss.

As unknown loss is simply that, retailers should be looking to determine the dollar value of this category than trying to ascertain where exactly it’s occurring.

The known loss category is more detailed, breaking defined loss into threats that are either malicious or non-malicious.

Malicious threats

Malicious loss is the type of loss that is purposefully perpetrated against a retail outlet either internally or externally and encompasses:

  • External theft
  • Internal theft (employee theft)
  • Customer fraud
  • Voucher/loyalty card scams
  • Burglary, criminal damage and arson
  • Cash theft

These are the type of threats that retailers combat via product protection (including electronic article surveillance and security tags), staff screening, policies and procedures, retail analytics, CCTV, and general security.

No malicious threats

The non-malicious threat category is slightly larger and encompasses factors like human error and wastage.

These types of threats are addressed through systems and procedure, along with staff training.

Non-malicious threats include:

  • Wastage
  • Damage
  • Spoilage
  • Missed returns
  • Natural disaster losses
  • Cash loss
  • Error

The value of TRL mapping

The value of Total Retail Loss mapping

As mentioned, the in-store category of the Total Retail Loss map is just one element.

The map also encompasses supply chain loss (including malicious threats like internal theft), e-commerce loss (such as theft in transit and counterfeit returns), and general corporate loss (such as fraud and non-malicious loss like regulatory fines and workers compensation claims).

Together, it paints a comprehensive picture of exactly where loss is occurring throughout an organization, and retailers can then assign a value to each section.

This helps define where resources need to be directed, and the tools which need to be employed to help mitigate the threat.

By consistently mapping loss across an organization, retailers can also make useful comparisons overtime periods to better understand what strategies are working and what needs to be specifically targeted or improved.

Because the reality is loss also changes over time as part of a continuing battle that retailers wage against changing trends and threats.

You can learn more about identifying where your loss is occurring here, or shop our range of security tags and security labels to combat malicious threats like theft.

a-pros-guide-to-selecting-and-positioning-security-tags-header

A pro’s guide to selecting and positioning security tags

When it comes to security tags, where you position them is almost as important as the type and size you select.

Why? Because all these factors affect the customer’s experience of the product and also impact the speed at the Point of Sale.

So as a quick recap, here’s a pro’s guide to selecting and positioning security tags.

Type

Security tags come in a range of types and sizes that are suited to different types of apparel along with further products like eyewear, liquor, sporting goods, and even baby formula.

The type of tag you select affects the product’s security, while also impacting how a product looks on display and the customer experience when they try it on or interact with an item.

security tags size

Size

The size of the tag you opt for will be dependent on the type of product you are protecting.

For example, lingerie requires a smaller tag type than denim jeans, due to the delicate nature of the fabric used.

Meanwhile, bulky overcoats would be better suited to a larger tag with a longer pin, but footwear that uses a lanyard to secure a tag to the product benefits from smaller or pencil-shaped tags as this is less obtrusive.

Size also impacts the customer experience, which is why optical tags are designed to be small, liquor tags are designed not to obscure brand labels etc.

Position

Tags should be positioned with four factors in mind:

  • How well they protect the product. i.e. they should be positioned so they cannot be ripped or cut off without significantly damaging the item and rendering it useless
  • How they affect the look of the product on display
  • How they impact the customer’s experience of the product when trying it on or interacting with it
  • How easy they are for the staff member to find and detach at the Point of Sale

Where possible, tags should be positioned on products in a uniform manner. This affects the look of a store and how visually appealing it is when a customer is shopping.

Uniformity also allows a staff member to quickly locate the tag at the Point of Sale.

Pro tips for products

Security tags for general apparel

General apparel

Type: Round, square, pencil or alligator tags are suited to general apparel

Size: Size varies depending on the type of products stocked, but smaller tags are better suited to lightweight fabrics, while larger tags with longer pins are better for heavy items like coats, jackets, and denim jeans.

Position: Again, this varies depending on the product sold.

  • For dresses, shirts and t-shirts – the rear of the collar or the end of the sleeve are the best locations
  • For pants, slacks and jeans – the rear of the waistband or through a rear pocket is favored
  • For skirts – The rear of the waistband or the hem of heavyweight, knee-length skirts is preferred

Lingerie and swimwear

Type: Pencil tags, alligator tags or small round tags

Size: Smaller

Position: The position varies depending on the product.

  • Bras and bikinis – Alligator tags are positioned to pass across the bra or bikini strap, while other tags pin through the strap, near the bra clasp at the rear, or just beneath where the strap joins the cup on the front.
  • Negligees and underwear – When it comes to negligees, underwear, one-piece swimmers or bikini bottoms, the tag is positioned at the rear near the brand label, or on the lower size seam at about hip height.

Handbags and sporting shoesLanyard Security Tag

Type: Fashion items like handbags and shoes are generally best suited to tags with lanyards or cables. These lanyards or cables allow the tag to be affixed to the product without a pin passing through the item.

Size: The size of the tag can vary, but pencil tags in combination with lanyards often offer a more streamlined look

Position:

  • Handbags -In the case of handbags, the lanyard and tag are secured around the strap of the bag, or alternately they are secured to the hole in the zip slider.
  • Footwear – When it comes to sports shoes, or formal lace-up shoes, the lanyard with tag generally passes through the upper shoelace hole.

Sunglasses and eyewear Optical security tags

Type: Optical tag

Size: Small

Position: Optical tags are designed specifically to fit snugly around the arm of sunglasses and eyewear and are small enough not to interfere with the customer experience of the product.

LiquorLiquor Security Tags

Type: Liquor (bottle cap) tag

Size: This depends on the bottle cap size, with standard and large-sized tags available

Position: Over the cap of the bottle

You can view our extensive range of security tags here, and find more details about selecting the right tags for your store here.